Class of Nonviolence
Lesson 2, Reading 3
by Eknath Easwaren
Personal relationships offer fertile ground to learn and use satyagraha. Gandhi called this “domestic satyagraha.” We get a clear idea of what he meant when we look at his early life in South Africa -not, interestingly enough, at satyagraha as he was to develop it later, but as it was used against him. Gandhi was a domineering, sometimes petulant husband during those years in Johannesburg, because he believed, as he recounts, that it was his right to impose his will upon his wife. When Kasturbai objected to his unilateral approach, Gandhi only became more adamant. But Kasturbai had an intuitive grasp of the properties of nonviolent love, and during those tumultuous years of domestic strife, she proved to be Gandhi’s equal. Her attitude transformed his relationship with her and in the process revealed to him the beauty and” the power of nonviolent resistance.
“I learnt the lesson of nonviolence from my wife, when I tried to bend her to my will. Her determined resistance to my will, on the one hand, and her quiet submission to the suffering my stupidity involved, on the other, ultimately made me ashamed of myself and cured me of my stupidity…in the end, she became my teacher in nonviolence.”
Without knowing it, Kasturbai had used satyagraha’s – foremost weapons to win over her husband: a readiness to suffer rather than retaliate, and an implacable will.
Family satyagraha is founded, like all satyagraha, on this delicate balance of patience and determination, in which, when rightly practiced can become a cornerstone for deep personal relations between men and women. The discovery Gandhi made in his own household at the turn of the century in Johannesburg is of critical importance today, when these relationships have become fraught with competition and tension. Few homes today seem able to withstand even the predictable tensions of married life. So that estrangement and alienation have become common ingredients in the modem household. At this low ebb, in family living, Gandhi’s way rings especially true: forgive, forbear, support the other person always, and when it becomes necessary to resist, dose lov1ngly and without rancor. The apex of this ideal is reached when the wife’s welfare becomes more important to the husband than his own happiness, and the husband’s welfare takes on a similar importance to the wife. This kind of relationship marks one of the highest achievements of true ahimsa.
Between parents and children, satyagraha has a natural place. Here again, patience mingled with firmness frames the approach. The “irreducible minimum” in family satyagraha is that the welfare: of the children comes first; their growth and development take precedence over everything else. It means making minor sacrifices of small pleasures at times or saying no, gently but firmly, more often than one wants to. Most important, in Gandhi’s thinking, is that the example set by the parents be true to their ideals. When Gandhi moved to Tolstoy Farm in 1909, it was with a motley group of children whom he immediately took under his fatherly wing. They were an “ill-assorted” lot, but in Gandhi’s eyes, he and they were “all one family.” “I saw,” he writes, “that I must be good and live straight, if only for their sakes.” The seeds of family satyagraha were sown by Gandhi in the rich soil of Tolstoy Farm, and years of careful husbandry brought them into full bloom; in time this demanding relationship with children became a natural, almost effortless attitude for him.
During the thirties a woman came to Sevagram asking Gandhi to get her little boy to stop eating sugar, it was doing him harm. Gandhi gave a cryptic reply: “Please come back next week.”
The woman left puzzled but returned a week later. Dutifully following the Mahatma’s instructions. “Please don’t eat sugar,” Gandhi told the young fellow when he saw him. “It is not good for you.” Then he joked with the boy for a while, gave him a hug, and sent him on his way. But the mother, unable to contain her curiosity, lingered behind to ask, “Bapu, why didn’t you say this last week when we came? Why did you make us come back again?”
Gandhi smiled. “Last week,” he said to her. “I too was eating sugar.”
Gandhi was personal in all his relations. Even at the height of the freedom movement in India, he would not allow his campaigns to drift into nonpersonal postures. Regud1ess of how institutional his opponents might appear behind their marbled corridors and initialed tides, Gandhi’s adversaries were always people first, “tarred with the same brush” and akin to him in their common humanity. Personal relationships were neither a luxury nor an imposition to Gandhi, but rather naaua1 and vital expression of ahimsa; at each level of human interaction they build the forum in which satyagraha operates – It is interesting to watch Gandhi’s circle of friendships gradually evolve from his immediate family in Porbandar and Johannesburg to his many followers living in his ashrams, until finally it included all India and much of the world.
One of the main features of Satyagraha, as we have seen, is its “open-endedness,” its capacity to adapt creatively to new contexts while adhering to its irreducible principles of truth and nonviolence. This flexibility has never been more important than today, when the challenges we face are so different from those Gandhi confronted. Merely to imitate the forms of Gandhi’s political campaigns, such as strikes and demonstrations, would tragically limit satyagraha to the narrow context of political reform. The crises that threaten our lives today are not so much political as spiritual: personal and social matters of alienation, isolation, and increasing polarization between men and women, old and young. Consequently, our times require a determined movement towards nonviolence and unity in our families and communities.
From Gandhi the Man
Eknath Easwaran (December 17, 1910 – October 26, 1999) was a spiritual teacher, an author of books on meditation and ways to lead a fulfilling life, as well as a translator and interpreter of Indian literature.He was influenced by Mohandas K. Gandhi, whom he met when he was a young man.
This reading is from The Class of Nonviolence, prepared by Colman McCarthy of the Center for Teaching Peace, 4501 Van Ness Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20016 202.537.1372